During 2 days, the twitterers commented and
analysed the Health 2.0 conferences on twitter. For those of you who didn’t
suscribe to the famous real-time platform, I hope you will finally find a good
reason to open an account : learning, sharing, joining the conversation, and
most of all, being part of the community.
You may already know what a conference
live-tweet allows :
- Taking
notes and publish insights of a conference
- Let
your followers know what was said on the stage
- Add
value of the conference by analyse and comments.
#health2eu Tweeps did all of these, shared a lot of information :
quotes, keypoints, links. But there was also a second, unofficial discussion
behind the chair, and on the virtual twitter-stage. It was part of the
atmosphere, and make me think, furious, or laugh during those 2 days and even
now.
Thank you to all tweeps for your 140-characters contributions ! Here are
some outputs on twitter conversations of the conversation.
- Preparing Health 2.0 Europe… -
Excitation is in the air. Every tweep begins to
announce his arrival in Paris, and, together, plan meetings of followings et
followers! Without mentioning pictures postted by happy tourists…
(Day 1)
- Introduction -
#health2eu tweeps enjoyed the
Health2.0 introduction and started quickly the feed. Matthew’s 4 points
definition of Health 2.0 was numerously rewritten on the web. It was clear and
concise as a tweet :
“Health 2.0 = personalised
search + gathering communities + intelligent tools + integrating datas with
content?”
We also
used twitter as source of collective knowledge for Parisian visits tips and
history of les Invalides, as for the sources of the presented graphs.
And the
most important, we survived the @iguard tweetflood …
- 1st panel : Search & content -
During
this panel, the tweeps noticed the introduction of @ShingoKeishioko a cancer
patient community manager from Japan, and was impressed by Bertalan Mesko,
@Berci ‘s presentation.
The
finance system between advertising and public finance and their perception in
Europeans vs in the American cultures were questioned. Essentially was it a
surprise for American people to understand how advertising finance was less worth
for Europeans.
- 2nd panel : Patients & online
communities -
Twitterers
admired the interface of PatientsLikeMe and Gilles Frydman’s definition of
participatory medicine:
Participatory medicine :
movement in which patients network shift from passengers to drivers of their
care.
Rumors
were heard and discussed about the notation of Healthcare professionals, trying
to understand if there was a difficulty of acceptance, and why, as for
everyone’s consideration for collective knowledge.
- 3rd panel : Physicians &
online communities -
The
tweeps were the echo of Sermo’s fame and reputation. But they noted a fail as
“Sermo founder never heard of doctors.co.uk” either.
And they
commented the panel polls.
“Lessons learned” was 1 of the most use expression
(esp. by @berci ) comparing every “fail” of the day, like showing bloody
surgery pictures.
- Evening party -
Feedbacks of the night were really
few. It seems everyone was too busy meeting people IRL (in real life) to
tweet. You enjoyed the party ! Some tried to make their followers jealous
posting them photos of our amazing evening meeting at les Invalides !
(Day 2)
- 4th panel : Health & tools -
People
noticed that no one dared to compare both speakers of Google Health and
Microsoft Healthvault – but didn’t neither.
A
question was raised about the multiplicity of online datas and tools for a same
goal. Do patients need so much choice?
- 5th panel : the Government view
point -
A
Big Up was unanomnimous for the Dutch and Netherlands examples, numerously
represented today, that raised the European models.
Some
of us, mainly French participants, noted the lateness of French administration,
despite its important representation on stage.
- 6th panel : Hospitals, Payers and
Health 2.0 -
The
session aroused further discussion about national differences, again and
without any surprises in a European and American audience. In these
discussions, a comparison between the American and French systems, based on
truly cultural differences like considering health as a right.
- 7th panel : Pharma and Health 2.0
-
We
particularly enjoyed this panel’s examples and storytelling, without mentioning
the adminaration for Daniel Ghinn’s (@EngagementStrat) 2.0 intervention,
tweeting while he was on stage, to complete his presentation.
Two
major points were raised, which were ROI questions and needs of transparency
-
Wrap up of the day -
General
agreement on our goal : better health access and outcomes for patients.
Nota :
transcript is to download here : http://www.denisesilber.com/files/health2eu_tweet_archive_final-1.pdf
Tres bien fait, Tiphaine!
Rédigé par : Matthew Holt | 15/04/2010 à 15:27